Services and Infrastructure
The QUEST Center offers a variety of services to increase quality of research. Further services are planned.
The QUEST Toolbox
The QUEST Toolbox contains helpful tools, programs and online platforms that aim at facilitating the reproducibility of a research project on all stages. The tools are sorted along the stages of the life cycle of a research project. The QUEST toolbox is aimed specifically at biomedical researchers. While some tools are specific to that community, others are of usage also in other research communities. We tried to go for non-commercial tools wherever possible.
Free access to the results of scientific work is one of the key concerns of Open Science. In 2015, the Berlin Senate passed the so-called Open Access Strategy for Berlin, which, among other things, formulates the goal that by 2020 60% of all articles from scientists of all Berlin scientific institutions should be freely accessible.
The ORCID iD (Open Researcher and Contributor iD) is an internationally recognized identifier for researchers. Since August 2017 the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin supports the ORCID Germany Consortia, because it considers the univocal linking of a scientific work with its authors to be important. Reasons why you should get an ORCID iD are mentioned in our ORCID iD at Charité - FAQs.
Electronic Lab Notebook (eLN)
We offer an eLN for interested BIH researchers from the Charité and perspectively the MDC. The eLN meets the criteria of Good Laboratory Practice (GLP), respective DIN EN ISO regulations as well as 21CFR11 of the FDA.
Guidelines in biomedical research
Guidelines play a crucial role in the quality and transparency of research. The reporting of research results according to specific guidelines (reporting guidelines) is required by numerous journals. Depending on the study design and research question, different guidelines are used. Common reporting guidelines are provided on the website of Cochrane. The EQUATOR Network also provides guidelines for preclinical and qualitative research.
The Meta Research reading list for peer reviewers
Looking for ways to improve your manuscripts and peer reviews? This “science of science” reading list can help!
When reviewing papers or writing your own papers, it’s important to remember that the fact that something is standard practice for your field doesn’t mean that it’s the best way of doing things. Scientists, journals and funding agencies are increasingly recognizing the limitations of many existing practices and are implementing new policies to improve transparency, rigor and reproducibility. Here we present a list of meta-research articles for authors and peer reviewers. These “science of science” papers will help peer reviewers learn to identify and understand the problems with some very common practices.
This collection of articles also offer constructive solutions that make it easier for authors to improve transparency, rigor and reproducibility.
Systematic reviews are a type of literature review providing synthesized research evidence to inform health decision-making.
Based on a clear research question and using standardized methods, systematic reviews aim to identify all relevant studies, data and information. Following a standardized and transparent critical appraisal of collected research studies and their results, research findings are synthesized qualitatively, or quantitatively using meta-analysis approaches.
Thus, systematic reviews provide a comprehensive understanding of the current evidence with regard to a particular research question.
You will find Workshops & training on systematic reviews and meta-analyses here.
LabCIRS – a Laboratory Critical Incident and Error Reporting System for preclinical research
The LabCIRS (Laboratory Critical Incident and Error Reporting System) is an anonymous error reporting system that was developed by the Department of Experimental Neurology at the Charité together with the QUEST Center at the BIH and is made available to the Charité - as well as to the entire scientific community.